It is true that we are
entering a world in which we will have to acquire new knowledge and skills on
an almost continuous basis, as the world is changing at a rapid speed. To
address the problem of growing global demand for lifelong education, the Open
Educational Resources (OER) Movement was put forth in 2001.
Throughout this course
I learned a lot about the educational potential of the Internet as a global
platform that has vastly expanded access to both formal and informal
educational materials. The so-called Web 2.0 has blurred the line between
producers and consumers supporting multiple modes of learning. The article
titled “Open education, the Long Tail, and Learning 2.0” by John Brown and
Richard Adler, was a new revelation for me. I got familiar with the idea of OER
and its role in the modern world. I think, this new movement is a very
necessary development for providing lifelong learning opportunities, as it
provides open access to undergraduate and graduate level materials and modules
for more than 1,700 courses.
One significant feature
of the Internet is fostering social learning which focuses not so much on what
we are learning but on how we are learning. I agree that knowledge is not a
kind of substance transferred from teachers to learners, but it is the understanding
of content which is socially constructed. My teaching experience has taught me
that one of the best ways to learn something is to teach it to others.
Another aspect of
social learning is the opportunity not only to learn about the subject matter,
but also to learn to be a full participant in the field. The traditional
Cartesian educational system can very well characterize the Armenian
educational system where students spend years learning about a subject and only
after receiving this explicit knowledge they start getting the tacit knowledge
of how to be a professional in a field. In contrast, the open source
communities follow John Dewey’s perspective of “productive enquiry” which views
learning as a process of seeking the knowledge when it is needed to carry out a
particular task.
Although these extended
connections were not developed to serve educational purposes, there are a
number of examples of study groups which have been created to help students
benefit from social learning. Such examples are the Terra Incognita project,
the Harvard Law School course called “CyberOne: Law in the Court of public
Opinion”, the Digital StudyHall, and others. The role that I see in these types
of informal learning is that they can coexist with and extend traditional
education. Some other examples of e-science and e-humanities communities, such
as Faulkes Telescope project, Hands-on-Universe project, or Bugscope project,
enhance the social leaning which creates a participatory architecture where
participants learn about learning.
I strongly support the
new demand-pull approach, in contrast to the supply-push approach, as the
former provides students with access to rich learning communities built around
a practice where understanding is formed through active, passion-based
learning, and fosters lifelong learning that extends beyond formal schooling.
As the article concludes, ‘this is a major step toward creating a 21st-century
global culture of learning to meet the demands of our constantly changing
world.’
In the podcast about
OER, Cable Green and Joel Smith speak about the challenges of access, impact,
and sustainability, and how to deal with these challenges. They mention that
the ultimate goal of OER is to increase the number of educated people and increase
the quality of education they are getting. To meet the challenges of this
movement, it was decided that having open licensed content is not enough; there
should be data analytics to collect assessment data for the improvement of the
quality of OER. This can also guarantee the accuracy, the completeness and the
context of the content which is very important for the individual learner. OER
needs to provide an instructional strategy, interactive exercises, and
comprehension checks to provide effective instruction. High quality open
content can be achieved if it is analyzed and revised on a regular basis, if it
is useful and appropriate, and if it is shared, as sharing can bring better
things; there is always someone outside who will find the gaps and fix them. First
of all, we, educators should be responsible for providing this quality.
No comments:
Post a Comment